Stock200K
- hypothetical · Annual Return (Compounded)
- -14.6%
- Max Drawdown
- 93.4%
- Trades
- 257
- Win Trades
- 63.0%
- Profit Factor
- 0.70
- Win Months
- 41.6%
About this strategy
Capture short term price swings that last several days. Both small and huge portfolios can follow the signals and AutoTrade is not required. Just divide or multiply trade size by appropriate ratio. Goal: >=10% per month.
UNIQUE FEATURES:
1. System based on extremely precise, reliable timing.
2. Highly profitable both short-term and long-term. In fact, profitable since Day One.
3. Extremely high return (ROI), weekly, monthly and yearly.
4. Extremely good at recovering from a price setback and turning it into an opportunity and a profitable outcome.
5. Extremely small drawdowns. Compare our small max peak-to-valley drawdown (historical) to other systems. Plus high profit factor, i.e. (Avg. Win) / (Avg. Loss) ratio.
6. Very small draw-downs means you can trade very safely in a proportional way. It is very easy to trade the system manually since the time frame is typically several days for price targets to be met. You can also do AutoTrading, of course.
7. Balanced: Both long and short positions are maintained. This means added safety in both bull and bear markets. However, you don't have to play the short side if you don't want to.
8. High percentage of profitable trades and extremely low drawdowns mean that you can be a pure bull or pure bear and do well from our signals, i.e. you can be selective and do not have to follow every trade mechanically, and still do very well.
9. Low demand on time and effort. This is not a day-trading system. Positions are typically held several days.
UNIQUE FEATURES:
1. System based on extremely precise, reliable timing.
2. Highly profitable both short-term and long-term. In fact, profitable since Day One.
3. Extremely high return (ROI), weekly, monthly and yearly.
4. Extremely good at recovering from a price setback and turning it into an opportunity and a profitable outcome.
5. Extremely small drawdowns. Compare our small max peak-to-valley drawdown (historical) to other systems. Plus high profit factor, i.e. (Avg. Win) / (Avg. Loss) ratio.
6. Very small draw-downs means you can trade very safely in a proportional way. It is very easy to trade the system manually since the time frame is typically several days for price targets to be met. You can also do AutoTrading, of course.
7. Balanced: Both long and short positions are maintained. This means added safety in both bull and bear markets. However, you don't have to play the short side if you don't want to.
8. High percentage of profitable trades and extremely low drawdowns mean that you can be a pure bull or pure bear and do well from our signals, i.e. you can be selective and do not have to follow every trade mechanically, and still do very well.
9. Low demand on time and effort. This is not a day-trading system. Positions are typically held several days.
Hypothetical Monthly Returns (includes fees/commissions)
| Year | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | YTD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2011 | 0.0 | 26.2 | -8.6 | -28.9 | 6.9 | -16.1 | 0.9 | -11.1 | -34.1 | ||||
| 2012 | 0.9 | 2.1 | -18.6 | -13.2 | -4.3 | 8.8 | 5.3 | 49.4 | 12.1 | -28.6 | -16.2 | -25.1 | -40.1 |
| 2013 | 10.7 | -8.1 | -3.8 | -3.5 | 7.9 | -22.8 | 4.4 | -9.1 | -12.9 | 86.1 | -27.0 | -12.2 | -22.4 |
| 2014 | 26.4 | -6.3 | 10.7 | -15.3 | 5.1 | 6.2 | 11.8 | -2.9 | 1.4 | -14.3 | 17.1 | -11.9 | 20.9 |
| 2015 | -10.3 | -4.9 | -5.2 | -2.4 | 15.3 | 2.3 | -5.1 | -2.7 | -9.5 | -5.0 | 1.8 | -12.1 | -33.8 |
| 2016 | -5.0 | -4.0 | 1.7 | -1.3 | 2.1 | 3.8 | 12.0 | 26.9 | -13.5 | -9.9 | 20.1 | -5.0 | 22.5 |
| 2017 | 9.7 | 9.6 | -13.1 | -19.5 | -10.5 | 11.1 | 1.2 | 6.6 | -0.0 | 1.0 | 5.2 | 1.4 | -3.0 |
| 2018 | -2.2 | 11.9 | -5.4 | -3.2 | 5.3 | -2.9 | 0.4 | -2.8 | 0.3 | 0.2 | -59.4 | -8.0 | -62.5 |
| 2019 | 4.6 | -0.4 | -4.2 | -1.6 | 4.2 | 21.1 | -0.3 | -9.2 | -3.5 | -7.6 | -1.8 | -1.4 | -3.3 |
| 2020 | 5.5 | -0.8 | -3.5 | -1.3 | -2.2 | 2.0 | 1.6 | 10.1 | -4.0 | -4.0 | -8.0 | 4.8 | -1.1 |
| 2021 | -0.0 | 5.1 | -6.5 | 12.2 | -7.7 | -1.5 | -2.3 | -3.1 | -7.2 | -0.2 | -0.5 | -0.6 | -13.1 |
| 2022 | 0.4 | -1.0 | -1.7 | -0.8 | 1.1 | 1.1 | 0.5 | -0.5 | -0.5 | -0.7 | 0.1 | 1.8 | -0.1 |
| 2023 | 3.7 | 3.7 | -2.1 | -2.2 | 2.2 | 0.3 | -4.0 | 1.1 | -0.7 | 2.8 | 0.2 | -2.4 | 2.2 |
| 2024 | -1.3 | 1.5 | -3.4 | 0.3 | 0.0 | -0.2 | -0.5 | -0.5 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 0.0 | -3.6 | |
| 2025 | -0.3 | 0.7 | 8.0 | -6.6 | -0.8 | -0.5 | -0.1 | 0.0 | -0.5 | 0.6 | 0.7 | 0.1 | 0.8 |
| 2026 | -1.2 | -0.0 | -2.9 | 0.6 | -0.1 | 1.6 | -1.8 | -0.6 | 0.5 | -0.2 |
Statistics
Overview
| Strategy began | 5/25/2011 |
|---|---|
| Suggested Minimum Capital | $200,000 |
| Age | 188 months |
| What it trades | Stocks |
| # Trades | 257 |
| # Profitable | 162 |
| % Profitable | 63.0% |
| Avg trade duration | 90.9 days |
| Max peak-to-valley drawdown | 93.4% |
| drawdown period | June 29, 2011 - Sept 08, 2026 |
| Annual Return (Compounded) | -14.6% |
| Avg win | $2,138 |
| Avg loss | $5,185 |
Ratios
| W:L ratio | 0.71 |
|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio | -0.02 |
| Sortino Ratio | -0.02 |
| Calmar Ratio | -0.40 |
CORRELATION STATISTICS
| Correlation to SP500 | 0.07 |
|---|---|
| Return Percent SP500 (cumu) during strategy life | 473.2% |
| Return of Strat Pcnt - Return of SP500 Pcnt (cumu) | -565.4% |
Return Statistics
| Ann Return (w trading costs) | -14.6% |
|---|---|
| Return Pcnt (Compound or Annual, age-based, NFA compliant) | -0.1% |
| Return Pcnt Since TOS Status | 0.0% |
| Ann Return (Compnd, No Fees) | -8.0% |
Slump
| Current Slump as Pcnt Equity | 1395.0% |
|---|---|
| Current Slump, time of slump as pcnt of strategy life | 1.0% |
Instruments
| Percent Trades Forex | 0.0% |
|---|---|
| Percent Trades Futures | 0.0% |
| Percent Trades Options | 0.1% |
| Percent Trades Stocks | 0.9% |
Risk of Ruin (Monte-Carlo)
| Chance of 10% account loss | 100.0% |
|---|---|
| Chance of 20% account loss | 100.0% |
| Chance of 30% account loss | 100.0% |
| Chance of 40% account loss | 100.0% |
| Chance of 50% account loss | 100.0% |
| Chance of 60% account loss (Monte Carlo) | 100.0% |
| Chance of 70% account loss (Monte Carlo) | 100.0% |
| Chance of 80% account loss (Monte Carlo) | 100.0% |
| Chance of 90% account loss (Monte Carlo) | 0.0% |
| Chance of 100% account loss (Monte Carlo) | 0.0% |
Automation
| Percentage Signals Automated | 0.0% |
|---|
Popularity
| Popularity (Today) | 0 |
|---|---|
| Popularity (Last 6 weeks) | 0 |
| Popularity (7 days, Percentile 1000 scale) | 0 |
Trading Style
| Any stock shorts? 0/1 | 1 |
|---|
Trades-Own-System Certification
| Trades Own System? | 0 |
|---|---|
| TOS percent | 0.0% |
Win / Loss
| Avg Loss | $5,185 |
|---|---|
| Avg Win | $2,138 |
| # Winners | 162 |
| Sum Trade PL (losers) | $492,575 |
| Sum Trade PL (winners) | $346,316 |
| Num Months Winners | 80 |
| # Losers | 95 |
| % Winners | 63.0% |
Dividends
| Dividends Received in Model Acct | 1702 |
|---|
Age
| Num Months filled monthly returns table | 186 |
|---|
Frequency
| Avg Position Time (mins) | 130827.13 |
|---|---|
| Avg Position Time (hrs) | 2180.45 |
| Avg Trade Length | 90.90 |
| Last Trade Ago | 5458 |
Regression
| Alpha | -0.01 |
|---|---|
| Beta | 0.23 |
| Treynor Index | -0.01 |
Maximum Adverse Excursion (MAE)
| MAE:Equity, average, all trades | 0.06 |
|---|---|
| MAE:Equity, 95th Percentile Value for this strat | 0 |
| MAE:Equity, average, losing trades | 0.13 |
| MAE:Equity, losing trades only, 95th Percentile Value for this strat | — |
| MAE:Equity, average, winning trades | 0.01 |
| MAE:Equity, win trades only, 95th Percentile Value for this strat | — |
| Avg(MAE) / Avg(PL) - All trades | -7.59 |
| MAE:PL (avg, all trades) | 0.03 |
| MAE:PL (avg, losing trades) | — |
| MAE:PL - Losing Trades - this strat Percentile of All Strats | 54.57 |
| MAE:PL - Winning Trades - this strat Percentile of All Strats | 41.79 |
| MAE:PL (avg, winning trades) | — |
| MAE:PL - worst single value for strategy | — |
| Avg(MAE) / Avg(PL) - Winning trades | 0.69 |
| Avg(MAE) / Avg(PL) - Losing trades | -1.44 |
| Hold-and-Hope Ratio | -0.17 |
RATIO STATISTICS
| Mean | -0.27 |
|---|---|
| SD | 0.46 |
| Sharpe ratio (Glass type estimate) | -0.59 |
| Sharpe ratio (Hedges UMVUE) | -0.58 |
| df | 39 |
| t | -1.07 |
| p | 0.86 |
| Lowerbound of 95% confidence interval for Sharpe Ratio | -1.67 |
| Upperbound of 95% confidence interval for Sharpe Ratio | 0.50 |
| Lowerbound of 95% CI (Gibbons, Hedeker & Davis approximation | -1.66 |
| Upperbound of 95% CI (Gibbons, Hedeker & Davis approximation | 0.50 |
| Sortino ratio | -0.71 |
| Upside Potential Ratio | 1.12 |
| Upside part of mean | 0.42 |
| Downside part of mean | -0.69 |
| Upside SD | 0.26 |
| Downside SD | 0.38 |
| N nonnegative terms | 18 |
| N negative terms | 22 |
| N of observations | 40 |
| Mean of predictor | 0.59 |
| Mean of criterion | -0.27 |
| SD of predictor | 0.33 |
| SD of criterion | 0.46 |
| Covariance | 0.02 |
| r | 0.12 |
| b (slope, estimate of beta) | 0.17 |
| a (intercept, estimate of alpha) | -0.37 |
| Mean Square Error | 0.21 |
| DF error | 38 |
| t(b) | 0.75 |
| p(b) | 0.23 |
| t(a) | -1.29 |
| p(a) | 0.90 |
| Lowerbound of 95% confidence interval for beta | -0.28 |
| Upperbound of 95% confidence interval for beta | 0.61 |
| Lowerbound of 95% confidence interval for alpha | -0.94 |
| Upperbound of 95% confidence interval for alpha | 0.21 |
| Treynor index (mean / b) | -1.62 |
| Jensen alpha (a) | -0.37 |
| Mean | -0.39 |
| SD | 0.49 |
| Sharpe ratio (Glass type estimate) | -0.78 |
| Sharpe ratio (Hedges UMVUE) | -0.76 |
| df | 39 |
| t | -1.42 |
| p | 0.92 |
| Lowerbound of 95% confidence interval for Sharpe Ratio | -1.86 |
| Upperbound of 95% confidence interval for Sharpe Ratio | 0.31 |
| Lowerbound of 95% CI (Gibbons, Hedeker & Davis approximation | -1.85 |
| Upperbound of 95% CI (Gibbons, Hedeker & Davis approximation | 0.32 |
| Sortino ratio | -0.87 |
| Upside Potential Ratio | 0.89 |
| Upside part of mean | 0.39 |
| Downside part of mean | -0.78 |
| Upside SD | 0.24 |
| Downside SD | 0.44 |
| N nonnegative terms | 18 |
| N negative terms | 22 |
| N of observations | 40 |
| Mean of predictor | 0.53 |
| Mean of criterion | -0.39 |
| SD of predictor | 0.31 |
| SD of criterion | 0.49 |
| Covariance | 0.02 |
| r | 0.15 |
| b (slope, estimate of beta) | 0.25 |
| a (intercept, estimate of alpha) | -0.51 |
| Mean Square Error | 0.25 |
| DF error | 38 |
| t(b) | 0.95 |
| p(b) | 0.17 |
| t(a) | -1.69 |
| p(a) | 0.95 |
| Lowerbound of 95% confidence interval for beta | -0.28 |
| Upperbound of 95% confidence interval for beta | 0.77 |
| Lowerbound of 95% confidence interval for alpha | -1.13 |
| Upperbound of 95% confidence interval for alpha | 0.10 |
| Treynor index (mean / b) | -1.57 |
| Jensen alpha (a) | -0.51 |
| VaR(95%) | 0.23 |
| Expected Shortfall on VaR | 0.28 |
| VaR(95%) | 0.14 |
| Expected Shortfall on VaR | 0.26 |
| Mean | -0.12 |
| SD | 0.73 |
| Sharpe ratio (Glass type estimate) | -0.16 |
| Sharpe ratio (Hedges UMVUE) | -0.16 |
| df | 876 |
| t | -0.30 |
| p | 0.62 |
| Lowerbound of 95% confidence interval for Sharpe Ratio | -1.23 |
| Upperbound of 95% confidence interval for Sharpe Ratio | 0.91 |
| Lowerbound of 95% CI (Gibbons, Hedeker & Davis approximation | -1.23 |
| Upperbound of 95% CI (Gibbons, Hedeker & Davis approximation | 0.91 |
| Sortino ratio | -0.24 |
| Upside Potential Ratio | 6.75 |
| Upside part of mean | 3.30 |
| Downside part of mean | -3.42 |
| Upside SD | 0.54 |
| Downside SD | 0.49 |
| N nonnegative terms | 431 |
| N negative terms | 446 |
| N of observations | 877 |
| Mean of predictor | 0.59 |
| Mean of criterion | -0.12 |
| SD of predictor | 0.37 |
| SD of criterion | 0.73 |
| Covariance | 0.01 |
| r | 0.03 |
| b (slope, estimate of beta) | 0.06 |
| a (intercept, estimate of alpha) | -0.16 |
| Mean Square Error | 0.53 |
| DF error | 875 |
| t(b) | 0.96 |
| p(b) | 0.17 |
| t(a) | -0.39 |
| p(a) | 0.65 |
| Lowerbound of 95% confidence interval for beta | -0.07 |
| Upperbound of 95% confidence interval for beta | 0.20 |
| Lowerbound of 95% confidence interval for alpha | -0.94 |
| Upperbound of 95% confidence interval for alpha | 0.63 |
| Treynor index (mean / b) | -1.85 |
| Jensen alpha (a) | -0.16 |
| Mean | -0.38 |
| SD | 0.73 |
| Sharpe ratio (Glass type estimate) | -0.52 |
| Sharpe ratio (Hedges UMVUE) | -0.52 |
| df | 876 |
| t | -0.96 |
| p | 0.83 |
| Lowerbound of 95% confidence interval for Sharpe Ratio | -1.60 |
| Upperbound of 95% confidence interval for Sharpe Ratio | 0.55 |
| Lowerbound of 95% CI (Gibbons, Hedeker & Davis approximation | -1.60 |
| Upperbound of 95% CI (Gibbons, Hedeker & Davis approximation | 0.55 |
| Sortino ratio | -0.72 |
| Upside Potential Ratio | 5.95 |
| Upside part of mean | 3.17 |
| Downside part of mean | -3.55 |
| Upside SD | 0.50 |
| Downside SD | 0.53 |
| N nonnegative terms | 431 |
| N negative terms | 446 |
| N of observations | 877 |
| Mean of predictor | 0.53 |
| Mean of criterion | -0.38 |
| SD of predictor | 0.37 |
| SD of criterion | 0.73 |
| Covariance | 0.01 |
| r | 0.03 |
| b (slope, estimate of beta) | 0.07 |
| a (intercept, estimate of alpha) | -0.42 |
| Mean Square Error | 0.53 |
| DF error | 875 |
| t(b) | 0.99 |
| p(b) | 0.16 |
| t(a) | -1.04 |
| p(a) | 0.85 |
| Lowerbound of 95% confidence interval for beta | -0.07 |
| Upperbound of 95% confidence interval for beta | 0.20 |
| Lowerbound of 95% confidence interval for alpha | -1.21 |
| Upperbound of 95% confidence interval for alpha | 0.37 |
| Treynor index (mean / b) | -5.78 |
| Jensen alpha (a) | -0.42 |
| VaR(95%) | 0.07 |
| Expected Shortfall on VaR | 0.09 |
| VaR(95%) | 0.03 |
| Expected Shortfall on VaR | 0.06 |
| Mean | -0.12 |
| SD | 0.13 |
| Sharpe ratio (Glass type estimate) | -0.96 |
| Sharpe ratio (Hedges UMVUE) | -0.95 |
| df | 130 |
| t | -0.68 |
| p | 0.53 |
| Lowerbound of 95% confidence interval for Sharpe Ratio | -3.73 |
| Upperbound of 95% confidence interval for Sharpe Ratio | 1.82 |
| Lowerbound of 95% CI (Gibbons, Hedeker & Davis approximation | -3.72 |
| Upperbound of 95% CI (Gibbons, Hedeker & Davis approximation | 1.82 |
| Sortino ratio | -1.41 |
| Upside Potential Ratio | 5.53 |
| Upside part of mean | 0.47 |
| Downside part of mean | -0.59 |
| Upside SD | 0.09 |
| Downside SD | 0.09 |
| N nonnegative terms | 64 |
| N negative terms | 67 |
| N of observations | 131 |
| Mean of predictor | 1.56 |
| Mean of criterion | -0.12 |
| SD of predictor | 0.53 |
| SD of criterion | 0.13 |
| Covariance | -0.00 |
| r | -0.07 |
| b (slope, estimate of beta) | -0.02 |
| a (intercept, estimate of alpha) | -0.10 |
| Mean Square Error | 0.02 |
| DF error | 129 |
| t(b) | -0.79 |
| p(b) | 0.54 |
| t(a) | -0.52 |
| p(a) | 0.53 |
| Lowerbound of 95% confidence interval for beta | -0.06 |
| Upperbound of 95% confidence interval for beta | 0.03 |
| Lowerbound of 95% confidence interval for alpha | -0.45 |
| Upperbound of 95% confidence interval for alpha | 0.26 |
| Treynor index (mean / b) | 7.33 |
| Jensen alpha (a) | -0.10 |
| Mean | -0.13 |
| SD | 0.13 |
| Sharpe ratio (Glass type estimate) | -1.02 |
| Sharpe ratio (Hedges UMVUE) | -1.02 |
| df | 130 |
| t | -0.72 |
| p | 0.53 |
| Lowerbound of 95% confidence interval for Sharpe Ratio | -3.79 |
| Upperbound of 95% confidence interval for Sharpe Ratio | 1.75 |
| Lowerbound of 95% CI (Gibbons, Hedeker & Davis approximation | -3.79 |
| Upperbound of 95% CI (Gibbons, Hedeker & Davis approximation | 1.76 |
| Sortino ratio | -1.49 |
| Upside Potential Ratio | 5.43 |
| Upside part of mean | 0.47 |
| Downside part of mean | -0.60 |
| Upside SD | 0.09 |
| Downside SD | 0.09 |
| N nonnegative terms | 64 |
| N negative terms | 67 |
| N of observations | 131 |
| Mean of predictor | 1.41 |
| Mean of criterion | -0.13 |
| SD of predictor | 0.53 |
| SD of criterion | 0.13 |
| Covariance | -0.00 |
| r | -0.07 |
| b (slope, estimate of beta) | -0.02 |
| a (intercept, estimate of alpha) | -0.10 |
| Mean Square Error | 0.02 |
| DF error | 129 |
| t(b) | -0.83 |
| p(b) | 0.55 |
| t(a) | -0.58 |
| p(a) | 0.53 |
| Lowerbound of 95% confidence interval for beta | -0.06 |
| VAR (95 Confidence Intrvl) | 0.07 |
| Upperbound of 95% confidence interval for beta | 0.02 |
| Lowerbound of 95% confidence interval for alpha | -0.46 |
| Upperbound of 95% confidence interval for alpha | 0.25 |
| Treynor index (mean / b) | 7.45 |
| Jensen alpha (a) | -0.10 |
| VaR(95%) | 0.01 |
| Expected Shortfall on VaR | 0.02 |
| VaR(95%) | 0.01 |
| Expected Shortfall on VaR | 0.01 |
ORDER STATISTICS
| Number of observations | 40 |
|---|---|
| Minimum | 0.60 |
| Quartile 1 | 0.92 |
| Median | 0.99 |
| Quartile 3 | 1.04 |
| Maximum | 1.27 |
| Mean of quarter 1 | 0.81 |
| Mean of quarter 2 | 0.96 |
| Mean of quarter 3 | 1.02 |
| Mean of quarter 4 | 1.12 |
| Inter Quartile Range | 0.12 |
| Number outliers low | 2 |
| Percentage of outliers low | 0.05 |
| Mean of outliers low | 0.65 |
| Number of outliers high | 3 |
| Percentage of outliers high | 0.07 |
| Mean of outliers high | 1.25 |
| Extreme Value Index (moments method) | -0.71 |
| VaR(95%) (moments method) | 0.19 |
| Expected Shortfall (moments method) | 0.21 |
| Extreme Value Index (regression method) | 0.16 |
| VaR(95%) (regression method) | 0.22 |
| Expected Shortfall (regression method) | 0.34 |
| Number of observations | 877 |
| Minimum | 0.63 |
| Quartile 1 | 0.98 |
| Median | 1.00 |
| Quartile 3 | 1.01 |
| Maximum | 1.35 |
| Mean of quarter 1 | 0.95 |
| Mean of quarter 2 | 0.99 |
| Mean of quarter 3 | 1.00 |
| Mean of quarter 4 | 1.05 |
| Inter Quartile Range | 0.03 |
| Number outliers low | 49 |
| Percentage of outliers low | 0.06 |
| Mean of outliers low | 0.90 |
| Number of outliers high | 49 |
| Percentage of outliers high | 0.06 |
| Mean of outliers high | 1.11 |
| Extreme Value Index (moments method) | 0.25 |
| VaR(95%) (moments method) | 0.04 |
| Expected Shortfall (moments method) | 0.07 |
| Extreme Value Index (regression method) | 0.19 |
| VaR(95%) (regression method) | 0.04 |
| Expected Shortfall (regression method) | 0.07 |
| Number of observations | 131 |
| Minimum | 0.97 |
| Quartile 1 | 1.00 |
| Median | 1.00 |
| Quartile 3 | 1.00 |
| Maximum | 1.04 |
| Mean of quarter 1 | 0.99 |
| Mean of quarter 2 | 1.00 |
| Mean of quarter 3 | 1.00 |
| Mean of quarter 4 | 1.01 |
| Inter Quartile Range | 0.00 |
| Number outliers low | 15 |
| Percentage of outliers low | 0.11 |
| Mean of outliers low | 0.99 |
| Number of outliers high | 12 |
| Percentage of outliers high | 0.09 |
| Mean of outliers high | 1.02 |
| Extreme Value Index (moments method) | 0.35 |
| VaR(95%) (moments method) | 0.01 |
| Expected Shortfall (moments method) | 0.01 |
| Extreme Value Index (regression method) | 0.15 |
| VaR(95%) (regression method) | 0.01 |
| Expected Shortfall (regression method) | 0.01 |
DRAW DOWN STATISTICS
| Number of observations | 1 |
|---|---|
| Minimum | 0.78 |
| Quartile 1 | 0.78 |
| Median | 0.78 |
| Quartile 3 | 0.78 |
| Maximum | 0.78 |
| Mean of quarter 1 | 0 |
| Mean of quarter 2 | 0 |
| Mean of quarter 3 | 0 |
| Mean of quarter 4 | 0 |
| Inter Quartile Range | 0 |
| Number outliers low | 0 |
| Percentage of outliers low | 0 |
| Mean of outliers low | 0 |
| Number of outliers high | 0 |
| Percentage of outliers high | 0 |
| Mean of outliers high | 0 |
| Extreme Value Index (moments method) | 0 |
| VaR(95%) (moments method) | 0 |
| Expected Shortfall (moments method) | 0 |
| Extreme Value Index (regression method) | 0 |
| VaR(95%) (regression method) | 0 |
| Expected Shortfall (regression method) | 0 |
| Number of observations | 6 |
| Minimum | 0.00 |
| Quartile 1 | 0.01 |
| Median | 0.01 |
| Quartile 3 | 0.02 |
| Maximum | 0.79 |
| Mean of quarter 1 | 0.00 |
| Mean of quarter 2 | 0.01 |
| Mean of quarter 3 | 0.01 |
| Mean of quarter 4 | 0.41 |
| Inter Quartile Range | 0.02 |
| Number outliers low | 0 |
| Percentage of outliers low | 0 |
| Mean of outliers low | 0 |
| Number of outliers high | 1 |
| Percentage of outliers high | 0.17 |
| Mean of outliers high | 0.79 |
| Extreme Value Index (moments method) | 0 |
| VaR(95%) (moments method) | 0 |
| Expected Shortfall (moments method) | 0 |
| Extreme Value Index (regression method) | 0 |
| VaR(95%) (regression method) | 0 |
| Expected Shortfall (regression method) | 0 |
| Number of observations | 3 |
| Minimum | 0.01 |
| Quartile 1 | 0.01 |
| Median | 0.02 |
| Quartile 3 | 0.06 |
| Maximum | 0.10 |
| Mean of quarter 1 | 0.01 |
| Mean of quarter 2 | 0.02 |
| Mean of quarter 3 | 0 |
| Mean of quarter 4 | 0.10 |
| Inter Quartile Range | 0.04 |
| Number outliers low | 0 |
| Percentage of outliers low | 0 |
| Mean of outliers low | 0 |
| Number of outliers high | 0 |
| Percentage of outliers high | 0 |
| Mean of outliers high | 0 |
| Extreme Value Index (moments method) | 0 |
| VaR(95%) (moments method) | 0 |
| Expected Shortfall (moments method) | 0 |
| Extreme Value Index (regression method) | 0 |
| VaR(95%) (regression method) | 0 |
| Expected Shortfall (regression method) | 0 |
| Strat Max DD how much worse than SP500 max DD during strat life? | -385519936 |
| Max Equity Drawdown (num days) | 5550 |
| Last 4 Months - Pcnt Negative | 0.8% |
COMBINED STATISTICS
| Annualized return (arithmetic extrapolation) | -0.22 |
|---|---|
| Compounded annual return (geometric extrapolation) | -0.32 |
| Calmar ratio (compounded annual return / max draw down) | -0.41 |
| Compounded annual return / average of 25% largest draw downs | 0 |
| Compounded annual return / Expected Shortfall lognormal | -1.15 |
| j156mfCOMBRisPar | 0 |
| j157mfCOMBRisPar | 0 |
| Annualized return (arithmetic extrapolation) | -0.22 |
| Compounded annual return (geometric extrapolation) | -0.32 |
| Calmar ratio (compounded annual return / max draw down) | -0.40 |
| Compounded annual return / average of 25% largest draw downs | -0.78 |
| Compounded annual return / Expected Shortfall lognormal | -3.53 |
| j313dfCOMBRisPar | 0 |
| j314dfCOMBRisPar | 0 |
| Annualized return (arithmetic extrapolation) | -0.12 |
| Compounded annual return (geometric extrapolation) | -0.12 |
| Calmar ratio (compounded annual return / max draw down) | -1.24 |
| Compounded annual return / average of 25% largest draw downs | -1.24 |
| Compounded annual return / Expected Shortfall lognormal | -7.36 |
Trading record
Placed 55 trades in real-life brokerage accounts.
| Symbol | Side | Qty | Opened | Closed | P/L |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ATPG | long | 3400 | Nov 18, 2011 | Nov 22, 2011 | $505 |
| DXCM | long | 2200 | Nov 8, 2011 | Nov 21, 2011 | ($423) |
| EXEL1119K5 | long | 130 | Nov 3, 2011 | Nov 20, 2011 | ($2,041) |
| EXEL | long | 6000 | Nov 3, 2011 | Nov 18, 2011 | ($1,703) |
| MTOR | long | 4600 | Nov 16, 2011 | Nov 17, 2011 | ($4,467) |
| SGEN | long | 1000 | Nov 9, 2011 | Nov 17, 2011 | ($805) |
| IL | long | 3533 | Nov 9, 2011 | Nov 16, 2011 | $737 |
| OPTR | long | 900 | Nov 8, 2011 | Nov 10, 2011 | $661 |
| DNDN | long | 3566 | Nov 7, 2011 | Nov 8, 2011 | $2,741 |
| GEOY | long | 831 | Nov 2, 2011 | Nov 8, 2011 | ($1,418) |
| NPSP | long | 5577 | Nov 3, 2011 | Nov 7, 2011 | $2,375 |
| DV | long | 1800 | Oct 31, 2011 | Nov 3, 2011 | $139 |
| DRV | long | 126 | Oct 25, 2011 | Nov 1, 2011 | ($2,750) |
| SPY1104W125 | long | 370 | Oct 27, 2011 | Oct 31, 2011 | $1,797 |
| AMZN1119K215 | long | 106 | Oct 26, 2011 | Oct 27, 2011 | $2,120 |
| NFLX1119K90 | long | 120 | Oct 26, 2011 | Oct 26, 2011 | $9,582 |
| AEM | long | 1412 | Oct 24, 2011 | Oct 25, 2011 | $1,314 |
| CROX | long | 2676 | Oct 19, 2011 | Oct 24, 2011 | $102 |
| AGQ | long | 308 | Oct 18, 2011 | Oct 18, 2011 | $3,702 |
| QID | long | 131 | Oct 10, 2011 | Oct 18, 2011 | ($1,654) |
| DRV | long | 116 | Oct 12, 2011 | Oct 13, 2011 | $1,784 |
| CLWR | long | 73280 | Oct 11, 2011 | Oct 13, 2011 | $12,846 |
| III | long | 66222 | Sep 23, 2011 | Oct 12, 2011 | $3,288 |
| DRV | long | 430 | Oct 10, 2011 | Oct 11, 2011 | $1,500 |
| MVG | long | 35154 | Sep 27, 2011 | Oct 7, 2011 | ($32,537) |
| MHR | long | 3500 | Oct 6, 2011 | Oct 7, 2011 | $625 |
| SPRD | long | 988 | Oct 3, 2011 | Oct 4, 2011 | $380 |
| KGN | long | 15377 | Sep 26, 2011 | Sep 27, 2011 | $6,915 |
| SPY1122V118 | short | 53 | Sep 22, 2011 | Sep 23, 2011 | $1,463 |
| AMZN | short | 1000 | Sep 18, 2011 | Sep 22, 2011 | ($34,805) |
Past results are not necessarily indicative of future results.
These results are based on simulated or hypothetical performance results that have certain inherent limitations. Unlike the results shown in an actual performance record, these results do not represent actual trading. Also, because these trades have not actually been executed, these results may have under-or over-compensated for the impact, if any, of certain market factors, such as lack of liquidity. Simulated or hypothetical trading programs in general are also subject to the fact that they are designed with the benefit of hindsight. No representation is being made that any account will or is likely to achieve profits or losses similar to these being shown.